The banksters need a war desperately right now. They’ve tried so hard in Syria, and it just hasn’t worked. Then they got crazy Trump actually saying we should stay out of the Middle East and focus on our own problems, and people were listening . . . What’s a self-respecting globalist financier to do?
So, they sent their puppets like McCain, Romney, Clinton, and Biden out to talk up the fight against “evil” and threaten Russia, hoping to fool those dumb white ‘Murkins one more time into sending their sons off to die for God and Country and Goldman Sachs.
The recently ousted Speaker of the US House of Representatives, who took at least a dozen votes to get elected speaker, traveled to Israel immediately upon his election, declaring to the Israeli Knesset that the USA is steadfastly committed to supporting Ukraine in their war against Russia.
It has become so painfully obvious, especially where you have someone like Nikki Haley wagging her finger and shouting down Vivek Ramaswamy in a presidential debate on live national television when the questions of this war and Israel are concerned, that the United States government has become a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Israeli Political Action Committee.
❝. . . the entire establishment in the Western world is attacking Russia in unison. The propaganda machine is in full swing in an effort to make the whole world hate Putin and take Ukraine’s side in the war. The same propaganda machine that wants nothing more than you as a White person to stop having children and instead focus on your career, race-mix or become homosexual. What this establishment wants you to think is often a very good indicator of what you should absolutely not think, and by this measure, Russia appears to be the side to support 100%.
From a global geopolitical perspective, if we theorize from the unlikely idea that this conflict will lead to a third world war, then all pro-Zionist liberal monster-nations like Great Britain, France, Germany, the United States and, of course, Israel itself would side with Ukraine, while more traditional and sovereign anti-Zionist forces would likely stand behind Russia. Mark my words when I say that the Nordic Resistance Movement will NEVER stand on the same side as Israel or the Zionist entity that the USA represents today – whatever the issue or conflict may be!
If we look at the situation from a revolutionary point of view, it is also natural to support Russia. By challenging the USA and the Western world, one acts against the status quo – the present situation that must be destroyed in order for any true changes to take place, and for us National Socialists to be able to make real progress. The more the current ruling powers are challenged, and the harder the world economy is combated, the greater the chance for widespread disruption, which is a necessity for the Nordic revolution to become fact. Please note that I do not mean the coming changes will necessarily be better for us; however, in the dramatic situation in which we find ourselves, we must see hope in every potential radical change that arises within the global environment.❞
So doing a quick search.brave, I found that 72-hour predicting, "so-called nationalist conservatives" that you seem to be referring to. Why it's the neo-con former Chief of Staff, general Mark Milley!
He's the woke warmonger extraordinaire and treacherous scumbag who never met a war he didn't like despite his laser-like focus on transforming the US Army into the wokest, most politically correct fighting force the world has ever seen.
Now we've got Putin right where we want him. Dug in, doubled-down, embarrassed, angry at the West for this proxy war and armed with the world's largest stockpile of nukes. Time to press on!
So name names! Who were the Putin-lovers who claimed it would last 72 hours?
Didn't every "Putin lover" echo his claims that the primary goals were to liberate the Donbass and prevent Ukraine from joining NATO? Show me this mythical strawman who thought that complete annexation/puppet state status was his goal and cheered him on nonetheless.
Now that you've demolished your own strawman caricature, why don't you address the real problem that many conservatives have with the brilliant 2020 Congressman Schiff strategy to "fight the Russians in Ukraine so we don't have to fight them here", namely that even if we win, we lose.
Measured in Ukrainian lives, our treasure, the prospects for the reserve status of the dollar (banks generally only get to steal their customer's money once), the compliance of our European subjects and our strategic position against China, we've already lost even if we manage to thoroughly bloody up Putin without incurring a historic tragedy of global scale.
And for what? To replace one despotic regime with another that's loyal to our rapidly collapsing empire? We're like the heavyweight world champion who, afraid to take on the new mean, lean undefeated challenger, drags the decrepit contender he beat 30 years ago out of the nursing home to beat him again just for old time's sake. Except the old geezer is armed to the teeth.
"The poor performance of the Russian Army in 1914-17 faithfully reflected the defects of the regime it served."
I have to disagree. Russia started out horribly but the army was better supplied as the war went on and fought very well. They destroyed the Austria-Hungary army and did well against the Turks it was just against the Germans they did poorly because Germany was just THAT strong. The Brusilov Offensive was possibly the best offensive of the war minus the final Allied push. The myth that the Russian army just bumbled along for most of WWI is due to Tannenberg plus the fact the autocracy and the government self-destructed which easily gives rise to that narrative. In fact if Nicholas II didn't insanely decide to lead the army himself and worse of all put his wife in charge then Russia very well might have survived. It was because his wife's incompetence (she seemed like a lovely person but extremely unqualified to run a country) and all the rumors about Rasputin sleeping with the Tsarina and the daughters that lead to the fall of the monarchy. I believe the army was fighting well up to the Brusilov offensive but due to the Russian public's hatred of the autocracy plus relentless Bolshevik agitation the Russian army became very mutinous and refused to go on offensives.
If the autocracy had just held on until the Americans arrived to bolster the western front or Nicholas II had abdicated in favor of his son (he couldn't because his son had hemophilia) or the Provisional Government hadn't been so stupid and let the Bolsheviks take over then the Russians would've been part of the Allied victory and the Versaille congress and the Russian army would've been seen as great contributors to the victory. They started and finished horribly but they fought well for most of the war.
The worst assessment I have read so far since the beginning of Russia's "de-Nazification" of Ukraine. In fact, it was so distorted and inaccurate I was only able to get about a third of the way through it.
The Chechens, the Wagner Group and Russian hard core regulars are leaving corpses of Ukrainian proxies all over the eastern battlefields of Ukraine. Meanwhile, there are rail cars of Russian military equipment heading west. Kiev is going to wake up to the sound of Iskander-M rockets.
The banksters need a war desperately right now. They’ve tried so hard in Syria, and it just hasn’t worked. Then they got crazy Trump actually saying we should stay out of the Middle East and focus on our own problems, and people were listening . . . What’s a self-respecting globalist financier to do?
So, they sent their puppets like McCain, Romney, Clinton, and Biden out to talk up the fight against “evil” and threaten Russia, hoping to fool those dumb white ‘Murkins one more time into sending their sons off to die for God and Country and Goldman Sachs.
The recently ousted Speaker of the US House of Representatives, who took at least a dozen votes to get elected speaker, traveled to Israel immediately upon his election, declaring to the Israeli Knesset that the USA is steadfastly committed to supporting Ukraine in their war against Russia.
It has become so painfully obvious, especially where you have someone like Nikki Haley wagging her finger and shouting down Vivek Ramaswamy in a presidential debate on live national television when the questions of this war and Israel are concerned, that the United States government has become a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Israeli Political Action Committee.
❝. . . the entire establishment in the Western world is attacking Russia in unison. The propaganda machine is in full swing in an effort to make the whole world hate Putin and take Ukraine’s side in the war. The same propaganda machine that wants nothing more than you as a White person to stop having children and instead focus on your career, race-mix or become homosexual. What this establishment wants you to think is often a very good indicator of what you should absolutely not think, and by this measure, Russia appears to be the side to support 100%.
From a global geopolitical perspective, if we theorize from the unlikely idea that this conflict will lead to a third world war, then all pro-Zionist liberal monster-nations like Great Britain, France, Germany, the United States and, of course, Israel itself would side with Ukraine, while more traditional and sovereign anti-Zionist forces would likely stand behind Russia. Mark my words when I say that the Nordic Resistance Movement will NEVER stand on the same side as Israel or the Zionist entity that the USA represents today – whatever the issue or conflict may be!
If we look at the situation from a revolutionary point of view, it is also natural to support Russia. By challenging the USA and the Western world, one acts against the status quo – the present situation that must be destroyed in order for any true changes to take place, and for us National Socialists to be able to make real progress. The more the current ruling powers are challenged, and the harder the world economy is combated, the greater the chance for widespread disruption, which is a necessity for the Nordic revolution to become fact. Please note that I do not mean the coming changes will necessarily be better for us; however, in the dramatic situation in which we find ourselves, we must see hope in every potential radical change that arises within the global environment.❞
https://nordicresistancemovement.org/which-side-are-we-on-in-the-ukraine-war/
So doing a quick search.brave, I found that 72-hour predicting, "so-called nationalist conservatives" that you seem to be referring to. Why it's the neo-con former Chief of Staff, general Mark Milley!
He's the woke warmonger extraordinaire and treacherous scumbag who never met a war he didn't like despite his laser-like focus on transforming the US Army into the wokest, most politically correct fighting force the world has ever seen.
Mission accomplished!
Now we've got Putin right where we want him. Dug in, doubled-down, embarrassed, angry at the West for this proxy war and armed with the world's largest stockpile of nukes. Time to press on!
So name names! Who were the Putin-lovers who claimed it would last 72 hours?
Didn't every "Putin lover" echo his claims that the primary goals were to liberate the Donbass and prevent Ukraine from joining NATO? Show me this mythical strawman who thought that complete annexation/puppet state status was his goal and cheered him on nonetheless.
Now that you've demolished your own strawman caricature, why don't you address the real problem that many conservatives have with the brilliant 2020 Congressman Schiff strategy to "fight the Russians in Ukraine so we don't have to fight them here", namely that even if we win, we lose.
Measured in Ukrainian lives, our treasure, the prospects for the reserve status of the dollar (banks generally only get to steal their customer's money once), the compliance of our European subjects and our strategic position against China, we've already lost even if we manage to thoroughly bloody up Putin without incurring a historic tragedy of global scale.
And for what? To replace one despotic regime with another that's loyal to our rapidly collapsing empire? We're like the heavyweight world champion who, afraid to take on the new mean, lean undefeated challenger, drags the decrepit contender he beat 30 years ago out of the nursing home to beat him again just for old time's sake. Except the old geezer is armed to the teeth.
"The poor performance of the Russian Army in 1914-17 faithfully reflected the defects of the regime it served."
I have to disagree. Russia started out horribly but the army was better supplied as the war went on and fought very well. They destroyed the Austria-Hungary army and did well against the Turks it was just against the Germans they did poorly because Germany was just THAT strong. The Brusilov Offensive was possibly the best offensive of the war minus the final Allied push. The myth that the Russian army just bumbled along for most of WWI is due to Tannenberg plus the fact the autocracy and the government self-destructed which easily gives rise to that narrative. In fact if Nicholas II didn't insanely decide to lead the army himself and worse of all put his wife in charge then Russia very well might have survived. It was because his wife's incompetence (she seemed like a lovely person but extremely unqualified to run a country) and all the rumors about Rasputin sleeping with the Tsarina and the daughters that lead to the fall of the monarchy. I believe the army was fighting well up to the Brusilov offensive but due to the Russian public's hatred of the autocracy plus relentless Bolshevik agitation the Russian army became very mutinous and refused to go on offensives.
If the autocracy had just held on until the Americans arrived to bolster the western front or Nicholas II had abdicated in favor of his son (he couldn't because his son had hemophilia) or the Provisional Government hadn't been so stupid and let the Bolsheviks take over then the Russians would've been part of the Allied victory and the Versaille congress and the Russian army would've been seen as great contributors to the victory. They started and finished horribly but they fought well for most of the war.
Putin should just install nukes in Cuba and be done with it!
The worst assessment I have read so far since the beginning of Russia's "de-Nazification" of Ukraine. In fact, it was so distorted and inaccurate I was only able to get about a third of the way through it.
The Chechens, the Wagner Group and Russian hard core regulars are leaving corpses of Ukrainian proxies all over the eastern battlefields of Ukraine. Meanwhile, there are rail cars of Russian military equipment heading west. Kiev is going to wake up to the sound of Iskander-M rockets.
I'm so glad to read this, at last. We'd love to publish it at CG with a link back to you--would you let us?