What was it you said of one of my posts, Mr. Gregg: "Classic?"
You state: "They [purportedly 'the Ukrainians'] are, not figuratively but literally, defending home and hearth, their country’s independence and its very existence, against a predatory aggressor bent on stamping out the Ukrainian national identity."
Do you mean stamping it out any better than, say, the Globalist machine of Obama-Biden? Do you really think that Victoria Nuland and the above company of characters care about "Ukrainian identity?" I cannot believe that you do, Mr. Gregg. (Since it is the Obama-Biden racket prosecuting this unjust war, I was initially tempted to call it a Lefto-globalist war, but -- really -- what the globalist regime has accomplished has been the near destruction of the meaning of the Left and Right.
More interestingly perhaps is the notion that Left and Right need be syntactically modified with reference to who is the perceived, reigning power. Then the propagandistic flavors of Left and Right are conjured up for the "journogandists" as needed to achieve given, manipulated opinions. But, of course, I hardly need explain this to someone from the Bernaysian world of advertizing, need I?
My heart aches for the Ukrainians -- and for Russians too, b.t.w. -- who are being pressed into this rusty-old meat grinder. I know both Ukrainians and Russians and worked with them both in the same place and I love them both. (Incidentally, the same is true for the Palestinians and the Israelis --- both unnecessarily abused and sacrificed for other, dubious goals.) This war in northern Europe, to return to that locus, is shameful and the shame is, largely, the possession of the United States and its puppets --- which also makes my heart ache because I have worked hard, and have lost much, in defending it as it was once, better manifested.
NATO – an anti-white and anti-family institution . . .
After the apocalypse of 1945, a number of global organizations have been formed with the aim of maintaining and expanding totalitarian liberalism. One of the earliest organizations formed for this purpose was the war alliance "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", or NATO, which can be seen as the military wing of globalism.
In addition to ensuring that Washington always has international support for its military campaigns, NATO as an institution is explicitly anti-white and explicitly dedicated to "racial justice" for racial aliens living in white countries. As early as 1999, NATO authored reports blaming nationalists for a number of modern problems and warning against the influence of nationalism.
In 2023, the war alliance held a summit at its headquarters in Brussels on race where the alliance's leaders pledged to fight "homogeneous attitudes" and to use NATO's "collective intelligence" for the purpose.
In fact, NATO is so dedicated to its anti-white agenda that it openly advocates that institutions must be reshaped to be "inclusive," in other words, restructured to be more anti-white, and consist of fewer white employees and executives.
Putin is operating in terms of an ethic as old as mankind. It goes like this:
"If you have something I want, and I'm strong enough to take it and keep it, I deserve it. If you have something you value, but you're not strong enough to defend it, you deserve to lose it."
It's barbaric, autarkic and it reeks of nihilism. But it's very, very old. If you doubt that, read the Iliad again.
FIGHT YOUR OWN WARS, YOU KIKESUCKING ZIONIST ASS-WHORE . . .
Sweden: Jews Call for Ban on Nordic Resistance Movement . . .
❝I ALWAYS LIKE to take note of Jewish organisations calling for bans on immigration resistance parties. You could say “Why bother? We’re surrounded by Jews screeching for White Genocide in various, usually artfully disguised, ways. This is just another twig on the bonfire.”
This is true. But arguments about the JQ and its relationship to White minoritization are open to various kinds of objection. You can quote this or that Jewish journalist calling for open borders or abolishing White people. Objection? “It’s just one guy; no proof he’s representative of anything other than himself; besides, he’s making a legitimate argument that’s open to democratic debate.”
That is why calls for bans on political parties assume a special moral significance. It’s a demand for the suppression of debate. And when it comes from an organization that claims to be representative of Jewry, and that claim goes unchallenged, then a special moral culpability attaches to the Jews.❞
After the apocalypse of 1945, a number of global organizations have been formed with the aim of maintaining and expanding totalitarian liberalism. One of the earliest organizations formed for this purpose was the war alliance "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", or NATO, which can be seen as the military wing of globalism.
In addition to ensuring that Washington always has international support for its military campaigns, NATO as an institution is explicitly anti-white and explicitly dedicated to "racial justice" for racial aliens living in white countries. As early as 1999, NATO authored reports blaming nationalists for a number of modern problems and warning against the influence of nationalism.
In 2023, the war alliance held a summit at its headquarters in Brussels on race where the alliance's leaders pledged to fight "homogeneous attitudes" and to use NATO's "collective intelligence" for the purpose.
In fact, NATO is so dedicated to its anti-white agenda that it openly advocates that institutions must be reshaped to be "inclusive," in other words, restructured to be more anti-white, and consist of fewer white employees and executives.
War is an ugly, brutal business, no matter how you slice it. But resisting the Russian invasion of Ukraine is about as just as it gets. I just wish the US and Europe had been more aggressive in 2022 about supplying Ukraine with the stuff to give that ass-whooping earlier and more decisively.
After the apocalypse of 1945, a number of global organizations have been formed with the aim of maintaining and expanding totalitarian liberalism. One of the earliest organizations formed for this purpose was the war alliance "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", or NATO, which can be seen as the military wing of globalism.
In addition to ensuring that Washington always has international support for its military campaigns, NATO as an institution is explicitly anti-white and explicitly dedicated to "racial justice" for racial aliens living in white countries. As early as 1999, NATO authored reports blaming nationalists for a number of modern problems and warning against the influence of nationalism.
In 2023, the war alliance held a summit at its headquarters in Brussels on race where the alliance's leaders pledged to fight "homogeneous attitudes" and to use NATO's "collective intelligence" for the purpose.
In fact, NATO is so dedicated to its anti-white agenda that it openly advocates that institutions must be reshaped to be "inclusive," in other words, restructured to be more anti-white, and consist of fewer white employees and executives.
As a retired Army officer and former NSC staffer, I firmly agree that the Russians deserve a first-class ass-whooping. You make a strong morality-based case for our involvement. An argument could even be made that this constitutes a “supreme emergency” for Ukraine (to employ Churchill’s 1940 phrase). But the debate about our interest shouldn’t hinge on supreme emergency and just war criteria. Setting aside the vitriol and assuming noble intentions for the moment, I think many opposed to U.S. engagement wouldn’t disagree that it is a just war (it meets the criteria). Their protestations seem to center on disciplining our pursuit of national interests: “The war may be just; it’s just not our just war.” Those claims continue to gain traction because nearly 600 days into this war, the Administration hasn’t offered a coherent strategic argument for U.S. policy. Instead of Reagan’s “We win, they lose”, we get Delphic pronouncements: “The American people are with you every step of the way…We’ll stay as long as it takes.” Americans should not have to divine interests, or rely exclusively on a morality-based argument to make the case for U.S. interests. We deserve better.
FIGHT YOUR OWN WARS, YOU KIKESUCKING ZIONIST ASS-WHORE . . .
Sweden: Jews Call for Ban on Nordic Resistance Movement . . .
❝I ALWAYS LIKE to take note of Jewish organisations calling for bans on immigration resistance parties. You could say “Why bother? We’re surrounded by Jews screeching for White Genocide in various, usually artfully disguised, ways. This is just another twig on the bonfire.”
This is true. But arguments about the JQ and its relationship to White minoritization are open to various kinds of objection. You can quote this or that Jewish journalist calling for open borders or abolishing White people. Objection? “It’s just one guy; no proof he’s representative of anything other than himself; besides, he’s making a legitimate argument that’s open to democratic debate.”
That is why calls for bans on political parties assume a special moral significance. It’s a demand for the suppression of debate. And when it comes from an organization that claims to be representative of Jewry, and that claim goes unchallenged, then a special moral culpability attaches to the Jews.❞
Agreed. But while some opponents of the war do concede that it’s just, many do not. It’s a fact—a sad one—that such critics parrot V. Putin’s propaganda line. They cannot be permitted to go unanswered.
I also agree that the Biden Administration isn’t doing enough to support Ukraine, either materially or rhetorically. I addressed that material part of that problem in this article:
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol No. 7 – World-Wide Wars
❝We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.❞
What was it you said of one of my posts, Mr. Gregg: "Classic?"
You state: "They [purportedly 'the Ukrainians'] are, not figuratively but literally, defending home and hearth, their country’s independence and its very existence, against a predatory aggressor bent on stamping out the Ukrainian national identity."
Do you mean stamping it out any better than, say, the Globalist machine of Obama-Biden? Do you really think that Victoria Nuland and the above company of characters care about "Ukrainian identity?" I cannot believe that you do, Mr. Gregg. (Since it is the Obama-Biden racket prosecuting this unjust war, I was initially tempted to call it a Lefto-globalist war, but -- really -- what the globalist regime has accomplished has been the near destruction of the meaning of the Left and Right.
More interestingly perhaps is the notion that Left and Right need be syntactically modified with reference to who is the perceived, reigning power. Then the propagandistic flavors of Left and Right are conjured up for the "journogandists" as needed to achieve given, manipulated opinions. But, of course, I hardly need explain this to someone from the Bernaysian world of advertizing, need I?
My heart aches for the Ukrainians -- and for Russians too, b.t.w. -- who are being pressed into this rusty-old meat grinder. I know both Ukrainians and Russians and worked with them both in the same place and I love them both. (Incidentally, the same is true for the Palestinians and the Israelis --- both unnecessarily abused and sacrificed for other, dubious goals.) This war in northern Europe, to return to that locus, is shameful and the shame is, largely, the possession of the United States and its puppets --- which also makes my heart ache because I have worked hard, and have lost much, in defending it as it was once, better manifested.
NATO – an anti-white and anti-family institution . . .
After the apocalypse of 1945, a number of global organizations have been formed with the aim of maintaining and expanding totalitarian liberalism. One of the earliest organizations formed for this purpose was the war alliance "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", or NATO, which can be seen as the military wing of globalism.
In addition to ensuring that Washington always has international support for its military campaigns, NATO as an institution is explicitly anti-white and explicitly dedicated to "racial justice" for racial aliens living in white countries. As early as 1999, NATO authored reports blaming nationalists for a number of modern problems and warning against the influence of nationalism.
In 2023, the war alliance held a summit at its headquarters in Brussels on race where the alliance's leaders pledged to fight "homogeneous attitudes" and to use NATO's "collective intelligence" for the purpose.
In fact, NATO is so dedicated to its anti-white agenda that it openly advocates that institutions must be reshaped to be "inclusive," in other words, restructured to be more anti-white, and consist of fewer white employees and executives.
https://nordfront.se/nato-en-antivit-och-familjefientlig-institution
Putin is operating in terms of an ethic as old as mankind. It goes like this:
"If you have something I want, and I'm strong enough to take it and keep it, I deserve it. If you have something you value, but you're not strong enough to defend it, you deserve to lose it."
It's barbaric, autarkic and it reeks of nihilism. But it's very, very old. If you doubt that, read the Iliad again.
FIGHT YOUR OWN WARS, YOU KIKESUCKING ZIONIST ASS-WHORE . . .
Sweden: Jews Call for Ban on Nordic Resistance Movement . . .
❝I ALWAYS LIKE to take note of Jewish organisations calling for bans on immigration resistance parties. You could say “Why bother? We’re surrounded by Jews screeching for White Genocide in various, usually artfully disguised, ways. This is just another twig on the bonfire.”
This is true. But arguments about the JQ and its relationship to White minoritization are open to various kinds of objection. You can quote this or that Jewish journalist calling for open borders or abolishing White people. Objection? “It’s just one guy; no proof he’s representative of anything other than himself; besides, he’s making a legitimate argument that’s open to democratic debate.”
That is why calls for bans on political parties assume a special moral significance. It’s a demand for the suppression of debate. And when it comes from an organization that claims to be representative of Jewry, and that claim goes unchallenged, then a special moral culpability attaches to the Jews.❞
https://nationalvanguard.org/2019/03/sweden-jews-call-for-ban-on-nordic-resistance-movement/
I absolutely don’t doubt it…
Putin is a pathetic Achilles, although he does have his heel.. . Zelenskiy is Hector reborn.
NATO = NORTH ATLANTIC TRANSGENDER ORGANIZATION
After the apocalypse of 1945, a number of global organizations have been formed with the aim of maintaining and expanding totalitarian liberalism. One of the earliest organizations formed for this purpose was the war alliance "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", or NATO, which can be seen as the military wing of globalism.
In addition to ensuring that Washington always has international support for its military campaigns, NATO as an institution is explicitly anti-white and explicitly dedicated to "racial justice" for racial aliens living in white countries. As early as 1999, NATO authored reports blaming nationalists for a number of modern problems and warning against the influence of nationalism.
In 2023, the war alliance held a summit at its headquarters in Brussels on race where the alliance's leaders pledged to fight "homogeneous attitudes" and to use NATO's "collective intelligence" for the purpose.
In fact, NATO is so dedicated to its anti-white agenda that it openly advocates that institutions must be reshaped to be "inclusive," in other words, restructured to be more anti-white, and consist of fewer white employees and executives.
https://nordfront.se/nato-en-antivit-och-familjefientlig-institution
War is an ugly, brutal business, no matter how you slice it. But resisting the Russian invasion of Ukraine is about as just as it gets. I just wish the US and Europe had been more aggressive in 2022 about supplying Ukraine with the stuff to give that ass-whooping earlier and more decisively.
NATO = NORTH ATLANTIC TRANSGENDER ORGANIZATION
After the apocalypse of 1945, a number of global organizations have been formed with the aim of maintaining and expanding totalitarian liberalism. One of the earliest organizations formed for this purpose was the war alliance "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", or NATO, which can be seen as the military wing of globalism.
In addition to ensuring that Washington always has international support for its military campaigns, NATO as an institution is explicitly anti-white and explicitly dedicated to "racial justice" for racial aliens living in white countries. As early as 1999, NATO authored reports blaming nationalists for a number of modern problems and warning against the influence of nationalism.
In 2023, the war alliance held a summit at its headquarters in Brussels on race where the alliance's leaders pledged to fight "homogeneous attitudes" and to use NATO's "collective intelligence" for the purpose.
In fact, NATO is so dedicated to its anti-white agenda that it openly advocates that institutions must be reshaped to be "inclusive," in other words, restructured to be more anti-white, and consist of fewer white employees and executives.
https://nordfront.se/nato-en-antivit-och-familjefientlig-institution
As a retired Army officer and former NSC staffer, I firmly agree that the Russians deserve a first-class ass-whooping. You make a strong morality-based case for our involvement. An argument could even be made that this constitutes a “supreme emergency” for Ukraine (to employ Churchill’s 1940 phrase). But the debate about our interest shouldn’t hinge on supreme emergency and just war criteria. Setting aside the vitriol and assuming noble intentions for the moment, I think many opposed to U.S. engagement wouldn’t disagree that it is a just war (it meets the criteria). Their protestations seem to center on disciplining our pursuit of national interests: “The war may be just; it’s just not our just war.” Those claims continue to gain traction because nearly 600 days into this war, the Administration hasn’t offered a coherent strategic argument for U.S. policy. Instead of Reagan’s “We win, they lose”, we get Delphic pronouncements: “The American people are with you every step of the way…We’ll stay as long as it takes.” Americans should not have to divine interests, or rely exclusively on a morality-based argument to make the case for U.S. interests. We deserve better.
FIGHT YOUR OWN WARS, YOU KIKESUCKING ZIONIST ASS-WHORE . . .
Sweden: Jews Call for Ban on Nordic Resistance Movement . . .
❝I ALWAYS LIKE to take note of Jewish organisations calling for bans on immigration resistance parties. You could say “Why bother? We’re surrounded by Jews screeching for White Genocide in various, usually artfully disguised, ways. This is just another twig on the bonfire.”
This is true. But arguments about the JQ and its relationship to White minoritization are open to various kinds of objection. You can quote this or that Jewish journalist calling for open borders or abolishing White people. Objection? “It’s just one guy; no proof he’s representative of anything other than himself; besides, he’s making a legitimate argument that’s open to democratic debate.”
That is why calls for bans on political parties assume a special moral significance. It’s a demand for the suppression of debate. And when it comes from an organization that claims to be representative of Jewry, and that claim goes unchallenged, then a special moral culpability attaches to the Jews.❞
https://nationalvanguard.org/2019/03/sweden-jews-call-for-ban-on-nordic-resistance-movement/
Agreed. But while some opponents of the war do concede that it’s just, many do not. It’s a fact—a sad one—that such critics parrot V. Putin’s propaganda line. They cannot be permitted to go unanswered.
I also agree that the Biden Administration isn’t doing enough to support Ukraine, either materially or rhetorically. I addressed that material part of that problem in this article:
https://unwokeindianaag.substack.com/p/biden-botches-ukraine
I’ve written extensively about the Russo-Ukrainian War; links to those articles published up to February 2023 are collected here:
https://unwokeindianaag.substack.com/p/one-year-on
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol No. 7 – World-Wide Wars
❝We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.❞
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/protocol-no-7-world-wide-wars