Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jack Sotallaro's avatar

Different opinions backed by fact-based belief are the pillars of discussion and compromise. Unfortunately the liberal-progressive side of the argument tends to argue their feelings instead of facts, and refuse to even look at anything that disagrees with their "religion".

Expand full comment
EKB's avatar

The issue ultimately is that the founders only mentioned the Supreme court and its jurisdiction, but nothing else. The federal courts were created by Congress. The federal judiciary's power is not inherent. Meanwhile if the dems are upset all Congress has to do is pass a law creating the right of a judge to pass a national injunctions. At that point the Court could do nothing about it. Barring a law outlining powers though, SCOTUS will interpret existing historical and legislative discussions to come to a conclusion.

Justice Ketanji though never struck me as particularly intelligent. Her politically woke nonsense that she couldn't define the word 'woman" because she wasn't a biologist is simply indicative of someone incredibly stupid.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts